|
Oxford Instruments
3d object surface classification 3d Object Surface Classification, supplied by Oxford Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/pm42277434-402-1-0?v=Oxford+Instruments Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d object surface classification - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Dandong Yichuang Pharmaceutical Co Ltd
machine learning classification Machine Learning Classification, supplied by Dandong Yichuang Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/pmc12905990-43-6-23?v=Dandong+Yichuang+Pharmaceutical+Co+Ltd Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
machine learning classification - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Biodesign International Inc
classification ia pugtdb database Classification Ia Pugtdb Database, supplied by Biodesign International Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/pm42314050-299-24-29?v=Biodesign+International+Inc Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
classification ia pugtdb database - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Protox Therapeutics
ld50 classification Ld50 Classification, supplied by Protox Therapeutics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/pm42316907-90-3-5?v=Protox+Therapeutics Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ld50 classification - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Hirschmann
cpak classification ![]() Cpak Classification, supplied by Hirschmann, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/pmc13274546-53-17-14?v=Hirschmann Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cpak classification - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Omics Data Automation
cancer subtype classification leveraging multi omics data ![]() Cancer Subtype Classification Leveraging Multi Omics Data, supplied by Omics Data Automation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/pm42300227-445-12-16?v=Omics+Data+Automation Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cancer subtype classification leveraging multi omics data - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Biotechnology Information
ncbi taxonomy browser ![]() Ncbi Taxonomy Browser, supplied by Biotechnology Information, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/pm42272257-229-11-9?v=Biotechnology+Information Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ncbi taxonomy browser - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Tokyo Chemical Industry
trip classification indicator ![]() Trip Classification Indicator, supplied by Tokyo Chemical Industry, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/us12651211-183-15-18?v=Tokyo+Chemical+Industry Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
trip classification indicator - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Carollo Engineers
ddi severity classification algorithms ![]() Ddi Severity Classification Algorithms, supplied by Carollo Engineers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/pm42261122-78-8-24?v=Carollo+Engineers Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ddi severity classification algorithms - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Kaggle Inc
brain tumor classification mri dataset ![]() Brain Tumor Classification Mri Dataset, supplied by Kaggle Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/classification/pm42250854-404-1-6?v=Kaggle+Inc Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
brain tumor classification mri dataset - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Article Title: Speaking the same language? A direct cartography between functional knee phenotypes and CPAK
doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70801
Figure Lengend Snippet: Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification with nine theoretical knee types. Source : Adapted from MacDessi et al. . aHKA, arithmetic hip–knee–ankle angle; HKA, hip–knee–ankle angle; JLO, joint line obliquity; LDFA, lateral distal femoral angle; MPTA, medial proximal tibial angle.
Article Snippet: The present study aimed to establish a theoretical mapping between the FKP described by
Techniques:
Journal: Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Article Title: Speaking the same language? A direct cartography between functional knee phenotypes and CPAK
doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70801
Figure Lengend Snippet: Deterministic mapping between functional knee phenotypes (FMA mean = x ‐coordinate − TMA mean = y ‐coordinate) and CPAK classification femoral. The x ‐axis represents the femoral mechanical angle (FMA): values to the left (FMA < 93°) correspond to varus femoral orientation, values to the right (FMA > 93°) to valgus femoral orientation. The y ‐axis represents the tibial mechanical angle (TMA): values below (TMA < 87°) correspond to varus tibial orientation, values above (TMA > 87°) to valgus tibial orientation. Population means (FMA = 93°, TMA = 87°) serve as phenotypic neutrality references per the Hirschmann classification. CPAK, Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee.
Article Snippet: The present study aimed to establish a theoretical mapping between the FKP described by
Techniques: Functional Assay
Journal: Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Article Title: Speaking the same language? A direct cartography between functional knee phenotypes and CPAK
doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70801
Figure Lengend Snippet: Correspondence between functional knee phenotypes and CPAK types across femoral (FMA = x ‐coordinate) and tibial (TMA = y ‐coordinate) mechanical angle intervals. Each functional phenotype corresponds to a 3° angular interval, defined as ± 1.5° around the central femoral (FMA) and tibial (TMA) mechanical angle values. The table illustrates the theoretical mapping between these FMA–TMA intervals and the CPAK classification. When the angular interval of a phenotype intersects several CPAK regions, multiple CPAK types are listed within the same cell. CPAK, Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee.
Article Snippet: The present study aimed to establish a theoretical mapping between the FKP described by
Techniques: Functional Assay
Journal: Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Article Title: Speaking the same language? A direct cartography between functional knee phenotypes and CPAK
doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70801
Figure Lengend Snippet: Distribution of functional knee phenotypes according to the Hirschmann and MacDessi (CPAK) classifications in osteoarthritic (OA) and non‐osteoarthritic (NO) populations. CPAK distributions obtained from the Hirschmann functional phenotype cohort are compared with those reported in the original CPAK cohort (MacDessi) in NO and OA populations. Four attribution strategies were applied: mean, using the central FMA and TMA values; interval, considering the full angular ranges (±1.5°) of each phenotype; stochastic, using Monte Carlo sampling within these intervals; and rare, selecting CPAK types located at the margins of the compatible aHKA–JLO space. aHKA, arithmetic hip–knee–ankle angle; CPAK, Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee; FMA, femoral mechanical angle; JLO, joint line obliquity; TMA, total knee arthroplasty.
Article Snippet: The present study aimed to establish a theoretical mapping between the FKP described by
Techniques: Functional Assay, Sampling
Journal: Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Article Title: Speaking the same language? A direct cartography between functional knee phenotypes and CPAK
doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70801
Figure Lengend Snippet: Hirschmann‐CPAK (HCT‐9) reading grid. CPAK, Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee; FMA, femoral mechanical angle; HCT‐9, Hirschmann–CPAK Translational grid; TMA, tibial mechanical angle.
Article Snippet: The present study aimed to establish a theoretical mapping between the FKP described by
Techniques: